One of the most valuable habits I learned from Army leadership culture is the After-Action Review (AAR). It’s simple, repeatable, and it builds a learning loop that compounds over time.
Most organizations say they want continuous improvement. But without a cadence to capture learning, “improvement” becomes a slogan and mistakes repeat.
What an AAR is (and isn’t)
An AAR is not a performance review. It’s not a blame session. It’s not “who messed up.”
It’s a structured reflection:
- What was supposed to happen?
- What actually happened?
- Why was there a difference?
- What will we change next time?
That’s it.
Why it works
AARs work because they separate people from process. They focus on causes, not culprits.
In business, you can run an AAR after:
- a project delivery
- a failed handoff
- a client escalation
- a product launch
- a hiring cycle
- a quarterly close
If it matters, it’s worth reviewing.
The trick: keep it short and honest
The most effective AARs are 15–30 minutes. Longer meetings tempt people into storytelling. Short meetings force clarity.
A practical format:
- 5 minutes: expected outcome + what happened
- 10 minutes: top 2–3 drivers (not 10)
- 10 minutes: actions—owner + date + definition of done
Turn learning into a system
If you want AARs to matter, build the habit:
- schedule them by default (don’t “optional” them)
- capture decisions in one place
- revisit last AAR actions at the start of the next AAR
This creates credibility. Teams stop rolling their eyes because they see learning turn into improvement.
Learn more: https://clarenceramsey.com/bio/ • Press: https://clarenceramsey.com/press/ • Contact: https://clarenceramsey.com/contact/
Leave a Reply